Bathroom Handicap? This is not really political .. but it deals with political correctness (I guess)
The other day I had to use the bathroom .. reeeeeeeeeeal bad that the stall was available was disabled, so I've used. When I came out there was a woman in a wheelchair to give me the eye the worst ever, as I walked by she whispered, "reckless". This really bothered me. Why should I wait in line for a bathroom when there is a provision.
Am I completely out of line on this ... or is just another case of people who are overcompensated for their misfortunes, which makes them bad when they have to wait a few minutes. I'm not ready to walk on eggs, what do you think?
In a club where I worked, we had a disabled "toilet". I am opposed to this use of language - simply because the toilets were not disabled.
It was then decided (rightly, in my opinion) that we also could not call it a toilet "for disabled people" - that the company is what turns off people who rely on wheelchairs, etc. - in with doors too narrow and not enough ramps to cope with a significant portion of our population. The people themselves are not disabled, they are perfectly capable of achieving and competence - the company disables them.
Thus, it was decided to call it a toilet "available". All right.
But - it was a nightclub, and management did not want others (drunk) customers to use and accessible toilet break - if, under the radar, he was kept locked - with a special key.
Nobody thinks it strange that the word "accessible" toilet is the only one who has been kept under lock and key?
Anyway - in answer to your question - it would have been much more sensitive to all users of the facilities if you were the tail and sh @ t you on the floor!
When you gotta go - you gotta go!
If you had sex in there, or drugs, and take twenty minutes on him, when there is demand for it to be "accessible" toilets - which is false, and the wheelchair user would be perfectly entitled to carry on with your foot on the way ...
I am more concerned about your thoughts to people being "overcompensated for their misfortunes. There are good and bad, people intolerant patients and in all sectors of society - and in fairness, wheelchair users are treated very poorly most of the time ...
anyway - all in my humble opinion ...
I would have done the same thing. Do not worry about it.
His disability most likely did not give him a bladder control.
It did not hurt him to wait.
Forget it. Handicap stalls are not reserved for the exclusive use of disabled people, they are there so many people with disabilities have access to facilities, if they may not have to wait a minute or two to use.
I do not think you were wrong. You must wait to use the toilet why not her? I think the good idea to let someone go ahead of me if they are disabled but do not feel bad if someone comes and looks to have everything and everyone was waiting on
I wonder if she would have given the evil eye if you had come from there in a wheelchair, on crutches, with a significant too soft. Anyway, she should have waited.
In my case, if you need to go pot bad enough, it's a handicap in itself. He completed something more difficult.
So, unless you take your sweet @ ss time in the barn, I do not think you have done nothing wrong. It was not like you have parked in a handicapped spot in the parking lot.
He had to go, you can not control that. Maybe the school must toilets more! Do not worry.
Posted on April 16, 2010.